The RMG note was secured solely by CCBM's interests in the remaining oil and natural gas leases in Wyoming and Montana. In connection with the Company's investment in Pinnacle, the Company received a reduction in the principal amount of the RMG note of approximately $1.5 million and relinquished the right to receive certain revenues related to the properties contributed to Pinnacle.

CCBM continues its coalbed methane business activities and, in addition to its interest in Pinnacle, owns direct interests in acreage in coalbed methane properties in the Castle Rock project area in Montana and the Oyster Ridge project area in Wyoming, which were not contributed to Pinnacle.CCBM and RMG will continue to conduct exploration and development activities on these properties as well as pursue other potential acquisitions. Other than indirectly through Pinnacle, CCBM currently has no proved reserves of, and is no longer receiving revenue from, coalbed methane gas.

As of December 31, 2004, on a fully diluted basis, assuming that all parties exercised their Pinnacle Warrants and Pinnacle Stock Options, the CSFB Parties, CCBM and RMG would have ownership interests of approximately 54.6%, 22.7% and 22.7%, respectively. In March 2004, the CSFB Parties contributed additional funds of $11.8 million into Pinnacle to continue funding the 2004 development program which increased their ownership to 66.7% on a fully diluted basis should CCBM and RMG each elect not to exercise their available options.

For accounting purposes, the transaction was treated as a reclassification of a portion of CCBM's investments in the contributed properties to an investment in Pinnacle Gas Resources, Inc. The property contribution made by CCBM to Pinnacle is intended to be treated as a tax-deferred exchange as constituted by property transfers under section 351(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The reclassification of investments in contributed properties resulting from the transaction with Pinnacle are reflected in accordance with the full cost method of accounting in the Company's December 31, 2003 balance sheet included in this Form 10-K.

5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

At December 31, 2003 and 2004, property and equipment consisted of the following:

Oil and natural gas properties not subject to amortization consist of the cost of unevaluated leaseholds, seismic costs associated with specific unevaluated properties, exploratory wells in progress, and secondary recovery projects before the assignment of proved reserves. These unproved costs are reviewed periodically by management for impairment, with the impairment provision included in the cost of oil and natural gas properties subject to amortization. Factors considered by management in its impairment assessment include drilling results by the Company and other operators, the terms of oil and natural gas leases not held by production, production response to secondary recovery activities and available funds for exploration and development. Of the $45.1 million of unproved property costs at December 31, 2004 being excluded from the amortizable base, $5.1 million, $5.8 million and $24.8 million were incurred in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and $9.4 million was incurred in prior years. These costs are primarily seismic and lease acquisition costs. The Company expects it will complete its evaluation of the properties representing the majority of these costs within the next two to five years.

 
 

 

 

F-18