Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. S.P. Johnson serves as member on the Board of Directors for Basic Energy Services, Inc. Due to these relationships, the Company has deemed these companies to be related parties. The Company incurred the following costs with these related parties:

 
 
 
 

__________

(1) Includes $1.2 million of net revenues related to wells operated by Brigham Exploration and $0.6 million of net revenues related to wells operated by the Company, resulting in a net receivable balance.

It is management’s opinion that the transactions with these entities were executed at prevailing market rates. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had an outstanding related-party net receivable balance of $0.2 million and a payable balance of $0.1 million, respectively.

See Notes 3 and 7 for a discussion of the investment in Pinnacle and Series B Preferred Stock with parties that include members of the Company’s Board of Directors or their affiliates.

Steven A. Webster, Chairman of the Board of the Company, is also Chairman of Avista Capital Holdings, L.P. and is therefore a related party to the Pinnacle transaction.

In January 2006, the Company acquired certain oil and gas leases for approximately $1.1 million from Black Stone Acquisitions Partners I L.P., the general partner of which is Black Stone Minerals Company L.P. (“Black Stone Minerals”). Thomas L. Carter, Jr., a member of the Company’s board of directors, is the Chief Executive Officer and an owner of a significant interest in Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Acquisition Partners also retains a royalty interest in the acquired leases, which are located in Mississippi. The terms and conditions of the lease agreement with Black Stone Acquisitions Partners I L.P. are generally consistent with the lease agreements that the Company has entered into with other third parties. Additionally, the Company operates three producing wells in which affiliates of Black Stone Minerals hold a royalty interest, acquired from an unrelated third party.

11.      DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company enters into swaps, options, collars and other derivative contracts to manage price risks associated with a portion of anticipated future oil and natural gas production. While the use of derivative financial instruments limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it may also limit future gains from favorable movements. Under these agreements, payments are received or made based on the differential between a fixed and a variable product price. These agreements are settled in cash at termination, expiration or exchanged for physical delivery contracts. The Company enters into the majority of its derivative transactions with two counterparties and netting agreements are in place with those counterparties. The Company does not obtain collateral to support the agreements but monitors the financial viability of counterparties and believes its credit risk is minimal on these transactions. In the event of nonperformance, the Company would be exposed to price risk. The Company has some risk of accounting loss since the price received for the product at the actual physical delivery point may differ from the prevailing price at the delivery point required for settlement of the financial instruments.

The Company accounts for its oil and natural gas derivatives and interest rate swap agreements as non-designated hedges. These derivatives are marked-to-market at each balance sheet date and the unrealized gains (losses) are reported in the net gain (loss) on derivatives in Other Income and Expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, the company records the realized gains (losses) associated with the cash settlements of these derivative instruments in the net gain (loss) on derivatives in Other Income and Expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded the following related to its derivatives:

 
 
F-23