operator. The second prospect, in which we retain a 15% carried nonoperating working interest through casing point and a 3% overriding royalty, is expected to be drilled in the second quarter of 2007 in the Central North Sea.

From the inception of our activity in this region in early 2003 through year end 2006, we have incurred approximately $1.7 million in total project costs, net of partner reimbursements, in the effort to maximize the value of our retained interests in this area. Our estimated firm project commitments for 2007 are approximately $0.1 million, largely for new acreage acquisition, data processing and, prospect generation, excluding contingent well test costs that may be associated with future drilling success.

Working Interest and Drilling in Project Areas

The actual working interest we will ultimately own in a well will vary based upon several factors, including the depth, cost and risk of each well relative to our strategic goals, activity levels and budget availability. From time to time some fraction of these wells may be sold to industry partners either on a prospect by prospect basis or a program basis. In addition, we may also contribute acreage to larger drilling units thereby reducing prospect working interest. We have, in the past, retained less than 100% working interest in our drilling prospects. References to our interests are not intended to imply that we have or will maintain any particular level of working interest.

Although we have identified or budgeted for numerous drilling prospects, we may not be able to lease or drill those prospects within our expected time frame or at all. Wells that are currently part of our capital budget may be based on statistical results of drilling activities in other 3-D project areas that we believe are geologically similar rather than on analysis of seismic or other data in the prospect area, in which case actual drilling and results are likely to vary, possibly materially, from those statistical results. In addition, our drilling schedule may vary from our expectations because of future uncertainties. Our final determination of whether to drill any scheduled or budgeted wells will be dependent on a number of factors, including (1) the results of our exploration efforts and the acquisition, review and analysis of the seismic data; (2) the availability of sufficient capital resources to us and the other participants for the drilling of the prospects; (3) the approval of the prospects by the other participants after additional data has been compiled; (4) economic and industry conditions at the time of drilling, including prevailing and anticipated prices for natural gas and oil and the availability and prices of drilling rigs and crews; and (5) the availability of leases and permits on reasonable terms for the prospects. There can be no assurance that these projects can be successfully developed or that any identified drillsites or budgeted wells discussed will, if drilled, encounter reservoirs of commercially productive oil or natural gas. We may seek to sell or reduce all or a portion of our interest in a project area or with respect to prospects or wells within a project area.

Our success will be materially dependent upon the success of our exploratory drilling program, which is an activity that involves numerous risks. See “Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Natural gas and oil drilling is a speculative activity and involves numerous risks and substantial and uncertain costs that could adversely affect us.”

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

The following table sets forth our estimated net proved oil and natural gas reserves and the PV-10 value of such reserves as of December 31, 2006. The reserve data and the present value as of December 31, 2006 were prepared by Ryder Scott Company, LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. and Fairchild & Wells, Inc., Independent Petroleum Engineers. For further information concerning these independent engineers’ estimates of our proved reserves at December 31, 2006, see the reserve reports included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The PV-10 value was prepared using constant prices as of the calculation date, discounted at 10% per annum on a pretax basis, and is not intended to represent the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas reserves owned by us. For further information concerning the present value of future net revenues from these proved reserves, see Notes 2 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

________________
(1) The PV-10 value as of December 31, 2006 is pre-tax and was determined by using the December 31, 2006 sales prices, which averaged $54.73 per Bbl of oil, $5.77 per Mcf of natural gas. Management believes that the presentation of PV-10 value may be considered a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Therefore we have included a
 
 

11